Wealth, Capitalism, and Healthcare: The Rockefeller Influence.

Wealth, Capitalism, and Healthcare: The Rockefeller Influence.

Explore the profound impact of wealth and capitalism on society in this insightful piece. Discover how figures like John D. Rockefeller influenced the healthcare industry, shifting focus from natural remedies to profit-driven pharmaceuticals. Delve into the implications of media control and the perception of living standards in various countries. Reflect on the ongoing relationship between money, power, and our health, and question whether we are truly receiving the care we deserve.

The Influence of Wealth on Society

Every time I reflect on the world’s pressures, I am amazed by its capacity for rapid change under capitalist influence. These capitalists have, in various ways, ensured that the "ordinary person" increasingly believes they are dependent on money and power. Just look around you, or listen to your own thoughts: what do you feel you need to demonstrate your worth, or how well you care for your family and friends?

Do the Wealthy Control Your Thoughts?

Through media—often owned by the wealthy—we are told precisely who we could be in the eyes of others if we adequately utilize their products and services. I am consistently surprised when I find myself in so-called "developing countries," where the "standard of living" is often deemed lower than in my home country, according to media narratives. In places like India, Indonesia, or Zambia, I frequently find the climate more pleasant and the food tastier, more digestible, and healthier.

Is the Food in India, Indonesia, or Zambia Inferior?

I recognize that I tread a slippery slope by labeling countries like India, Indonesia, and Zambia as having lower living standards, while many residents there experience a "sky's-the-limit" mentality. Thank goodness for that! I assert it is never my intention to insult anyone. In fact, during my stay in Bali, Indonesia, I enjoyed nutritious and delicious food daily, far surpassing what I typically find in the Netherlands.

What Were John D. Rockefeller's Plans for Our World?

Historically, there have been numerous wealthy individuals who have sought to profit at our expense. One notable example is John D. Rockefeller (1839-1937), an American oil magnate who became one of the richest people of his time. However, his wealth did not quell his ambition for more.

What Do Oil and Heart Medicine Have in Common?

Rockefeller discovered that certain crude oils contained medicinal properties that could potentially transform healthcare. During his era, diseases were primarily treated using natural herbs, which were often freely available. Rockefeller developed "new" drugs in his chemical laboratory and launched an extensive marketing campaign to promote these products globally. Many longstanding natural remedies suddenly became sidelined, while his chemically produced drugs were marketed as the new standard.

Did Politicians and World Leaders Participate in Rockefeller's Campaign?

It is almost inevitable that many politicians and world leaders participated in Rockefeller’s lobbying efforts. His new drugs, often addictive and expensive, were produced by a German chemical giant he acquired, which previously manufactured chemical weapons. Disguised by a clever marketing strategy, the negative aspects such as addiction and price gouging were concealed. Rockefeller's influence allowed him to monopolize the industry, accumulating vast wealth in the process.

Are We All Addicts Funding the Rich?

Rockefeller's power grew to the extent that he became president of the American Medical Association, one of the most influential organizations in American healthcare. He ensured that medical training prioritized his products over all others. The healing properties of plants and traditional diets were systematically erased from medical literature, replaced by his manufactured drugs. Those who opposed Rockefeller faced severe repercussions, often being discredited or silenced.

Are You Well Taken Care Of by Your Doctors?

Are you confident that your healthcare providers always tell the truth and offer the most effective treatments? It appears that Rockefeller and others transformed global healthcare into a capitalist stronghold, with little regard for genuine patient care. Even when evidence emerged that his drugs could cause harm, Rockefeller sought to suppress that information, silencing dissenting doctors and removing their voices from public discourse.

Money and Power: The Drivers of Humanity

As we navigate this complex landscape, one cannot help but ponder the extent to which the medical industry, driven by profit motives, impacts our health. The monopolistic practices established by figures like Rockefeller continue to shape our healthcare today. After considering all this, I wish you good health. Do you wish the same for me? Money and power remain the primary motivators for many people on our planet.

Healthcare: Fixing Wait Times and Staffing Gaps

Health issues

Access to healthcare is a critical issue, especially in the Netherlands, where many face challenges like long phone queues and disconnected calls at hospitals such as Meander Hospital. These frustrations highlight the need for improved communication and transparency. Unregistered healthcare professionals raise concerns about accountability, while staff shortages exacerbate access issues. Socioeconomic factors further complicate the landscape, underscoring the importance of open dialogues between healthcare providers and communities to ensure that every patient receives the care they need.

The Importance of Accessible Healthcare

Access to healthcare is a fundamental concern for many individuals, and it varies significantly depending on the country and the healthcare system in place. Some people frequently seek medical attention, while others might hesitate due to various barriers, including fear, procrastination, or difficulty navigating the system. Ideally, if you need to see a doctor or specialist, you should be able to do so without unnecessary obstacles. However, recent experiences can cast doubt on whether healthcare is genuinely accessible to everyone.

Frustrating Experiences at Meander Hospital

I recently had a frustrating experience at Meander Hospital in Amersfoort, Netherlands. Due to some health issues, I tried to make an appointment over the phone. Upon calling, I was placed in a phone queue, and the recorded message informed me that there were four people ahead of me. I was given the option to leave my number for a callback at 2:45 PM, which was nearly an hour later. At that moment, I thought, "It’s a hospital queue; five minutes per person should mean a wait of about twenty minutes." To my surprise, after about fifteen minutes, my call was dropped unexpectedly, and I was left to redial.

The Callback Experience

Upon calling back, I was surprised when a representative called me within ten minutes of my previous call. This person seemed to have a rather indifferent attitude, possibly from dealing with irritated patients repeatedly experiencing similar frustrations. Instead of allowing me to make a physical appointment, I was instructed to settle for a telephone appointment. This experience raised several questions about the efficiency of communication within healthcare systems.

Do Phone Queues Serve Their Purpose?

Do phone queues at hospitals even serve their intended purpose? While they aim to manage patient flow, they can often lead to added stress and anxiety. When dealing with health issues, patients are already under significant pressure, and the last thing they need is the added frustration of a lengthy phone wait, only to be disconnected without warning. This situation begs the question: Is the healthcare system structured in a way that genuinely prioritizes patient needs, or does it focus more on operational efficiency at the cost of patient experience?

The Issue of Unknown Callback Numbers

Furthermore, a concerning aspect of my interaction with the hospital was the anonymity of the callback number. The hospital's representatives always called back from unknown numbers, leading to confusion and missed connections. This lack of transparency is a missed opportunity for healthcare institutions to build trust with their patients. Clear communication about how and when patients can expect to be contacted could significantly alleviate some of the frustrations associated with the process.

Oversight and Accountability in Healthcare

These frustrations highlight deeper issues within the healthcare system. Recently, I learned about a troubling incident involving a doctor at the GGD (Municipal Health Service) in the Netherlands, who had worked with children for four years without being a registered doctor. This raises significant concerns about oversight and accountability within the healthcare sector. When unqualified individuals are allowed to work with vulnerable populations, the potential for long-term harm is immense. It is crucial that healthcare systems rigorously vet and monitor their personnel to ensure that only qualified professionals are providing care.

Trust in Healthcare Professionals

The question then arises: Are we truly able to rely on those in academic and medical fields to maintain the standards necessary for patient safety? This incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of strict recruitment policies in healthcare. We must be vigilant and proactive in ensuring that individuals in responsible positions are thoroughly vetted and qualified to provide the care patients need.

Staff Shortages and Their Impact

Moreover, the current staff shortages in healthcare cannot be overlooked. Many sectors are experiencing shortages, often attributed to various factors, including burnout and the pressures intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, while addressing workforce shortages is essential, it should never come at the expense of patient safety and care quality. Healthcare institutions must find a way to balance the need for personnel with the imperative to maintain high standards of care.

Socioeconomic Factors in Healthcare Access

In discussions about healthcare accessibility, it’s also vital to consider socioeconomic factors. In many countries, disparities in healthcare access are stark. The focus on profitability can lead to ethical dilemmas, where the most vulnerable populations are often left without adequate care. The increasing costs associated with healthcare can deter young people from pursuing careers in this field, especially when they perceive the financial gains to outweigh the altruistic motivations for entering the profession. As a society, we must critically examine our values and priorities when it comes to healthcare.

The Need for Stricter Oversight

Your call for stricter oversight in the recruitment and management of healthcare professionals is particularly timely. It is crucial that we foster an environment where accountability is prioritized. Additionally, it may be beneficial for healthcare institutions to engage in open dialogues with communities about their needs and concerns. By doing so, they can better understand the barriers that patients face and work toward solutions that improve accessibility and quality of care.

Conclusion: A Call for Systemic Improvements

In conclusion, the complexities surrounding healthcare access are multifaceted. While many individuals face significant challenges when seeking medical attention, systemic improvements are necessary to create a more equitable system. By addressing communication inefficiencies, ensuring rigorous recruitment practices, and fostering open dialogues with communities, we can work towards a healthcare environment that truly prioritizes the needs of all patients. The goal should be to create a system where everyone has access to the care they need, without unnecessary obstacles or frustrations.

Embrace Natural Healing with Alternative Healthcare

Explore the long-term benefits of alternative healthcare, holistic treatments, and natural healing.

Discover the long-term benefits of alternative healthcare and why natural healing may be a better choice than conventional medicine. Learn about the holistic approach to health, the sustainability of natural remedies, and how these treatments address the root causes of ailments.

Explore the skepticism towards alternative medicine, the financial implications, and the importance of empowering individuals with healthcare choices. Unlock the potential of natural remedies for a healthier, more sustainable future.

There is an alternative that is probably better than most think. It takes a little longer and often costs a little more, but in the long run, it will be much better for you, according to insiders. I am talking about regular healthcare as opposed to alternative healthcare. More and more people find the alternative better than the regular one. There are increasingly more voices telling us this. By now, you will understand that the natural way of healing is always better. Long before our era, this phenomenon was known to many people. It often takes a little longer for the ailment to disappear, but it is much more durable afterwards.

Is sustainability going to win?

A big difference compared to the medicines you get from the regular circuit is that they are often of a chemical nature and difficult for the body to break down. The organic ones, on the other hand, are broken down and often tackle the problem holistically. The chemical ones chase away the pain faster but do not directly solve the underlying cause. They often react worse to other organs or other parts of our body. This post is not an indictment of mainstream medicine, but it might make you think. What really got me thinking about this subject was the following: "Conventional medicine often only chases away the ailment, but not the underlying cause."

Does natural healing cost us too much?

You may also notice that the bottles and jars in which the natural medicines are sold no longer state what they do and what exactly they are for? Especially in the Netherlands, it is strictly monitored that these things are no longer mentioned on the packaging of these products. A few years ago, this was banned by the Dutch government, but why? In many Asian countries where Ayurvedic medicine originated, these remedies are still used enthusiastically. In these countries, the inhabitants are convinced of the effectiveness of these natural remedies. For centuries, cinnamon, ginger, coriander, turmeric, and many other seeds and spices have had medicinal properties. People here use them daily and are also firmly convinced of the effect of these herbs.

Does modern medicine see us as machines?

Why is there so much opposition from academia in the West to the use of these Ayurvedic medicines? It is always loudly claimed that the prevention of these substances has not been sufficiently scientifically demonstrated. But is there any science at all working to prove this? Is a long-term good holistic healing method interesting for the same science? Why is science active on our planet where everything must go faster and better? Why is this speed so important? Why isn't holistic medicine being looked at much more by the entire academic world?

Are we humans still guinea pigs after all?

Are these ancient cures and natural medicines perhaps too simple or impossible for the pharmaceutical industry to commercialize? Is too little profit expected from these items? Should things be presented more difficultly to the world's population so that more money can be earned? It seems to me that the "modern" means are mainly developed to get people back on their feet quickly despite their complaints, so that they can resume their work as soon as possible. Work from which the prosperous of this world earn their prosperity. Prosperity that is jealously maintained with the support of the academic world. These academics are highly educated and don't like to have their "feet in the mud."

Is humanity being protected or robbed by the medical profession?

So, the question remains: what purpose does the medical/academic world have for us humans? Why do they keep alternative and Ayurvedic medicine so strictly at bay? Herbs and spice mixtures have proven their value to entire tribes in the Asian world for millennia. Herbs that you can often grow at home without too much effort or buy everywhere in shops for a relatively small amount.

Will you also help increase the profits of the pharmaceutical companies?

It seems as if academia wants to protect itself from these relatively cheap, effective drugs. What do the academics protect us from or against? And why can't you, as a patient, choose the Ayurvedic variant of a medicine after reading any package leaflet? Does not mentioning the "instructions for use and efficacy" of Ayurvedic remedies prevent too many people from switching immediately, heralding the bankruptcy of today's medical profession? Or does the academic world ensure that we return to work more quickly, so that medical costs do not rise too high?

Is our way of becoming healthy determined by employers?

The average pharmacist cannot tell me, and perhaps many others, that they do not know the effect of many Ayurvedic medicines and herbs. Mind you, I am in favor of good quality control in advance. Surely quality control shouldn't be such a problem with the current state of medical science. Please let people be in control of their own health, give people back control over their own health. Set different requirements for getting healthy, and make healthy, not just fit for work. Who agrees with me?

You may also like to read the benefits of walking on the green grass, heal now.