Trump’s Global Chess Game: NATO, EU, and the Future of Security

Last night, I played chess with my nephew. Neither of us is an expert, but we enjoy the game. It usually ends in checkmate. Similarly, in global politics, figures like Donald Trump use chess as a metaphor for strategy. With NATO and the EU involved, Trump’s moves spark questions about global security. Will Europe’s countermoves succeed, or will tensions escalate in this high-stakes game?

Last night, as usual at our house, I was playing chess with my twelve-year-old nephew. Neither of us knows much about chess, but fortunately we still.

Trump's Global Chess Game

see it as a board game. Sometimes we have to think a little longer about a move, but often that "deep thinking" is more of a way to get the other person out of concentration, and to show that a move has been thought through better than the other thinks, in short, to give the game a slightly more serious character. The game usually takes a little longer than we had estimated beforehand. What is always certain in advance is that the game will probably end in a checkmate of mine or my nephew!

Donald trump chess game
Image: Reddit | #image_title

Is checkmate always the end of the game?

In our case, checkmate is always the end of the game. We then shake hands, start a new game, and or clean up the chessboard and the chess pieces in the closet again. The chess equipment usually comes out of the closet a month later when another acquaintance or family member comes along who can play chess. Well, chess is a game that suits you or that you don't. Many people prefer to play cards or checkers. But there are also people in our world who play chess without a chessboard and/or chess pieces, they often only play chess in their heads. Many managers and politicians are only too happy to use this on a daily basis during their work.

Is Donald Trump also playing chess with the security of our world?

Last night it was clear in the daily news for a chess player that US President Donald Trump also loves chess. Only at this moment I think he only thinks he knows how this chess game will end. Whether his reality will also become the truth at the end of his current game, we as the world's population will have to wait and see. Many citizens in the world will have held their breath last night as Trump made his next move in the chess game, and in all honesty I wonder if the supporters around Trump's chess table understand the strategy the American President is playing at the moment, I doubt even that the world's most advanced chess computers can still follow him at this point?

What countermoves do Europe and the rest of the world make in this chess game?

Has Trump and the rest of his administration thought seriously enough about the next countermove from the rest of the world? How many moves has Trump already thought ahead, and how quickly does he think he can checkmate the rest of the world, and whether, can he checkmate the rest of the world? How many moves does he still have to make for that and how much damage does he cause to the rest of the world's citizens? How many people in the world do you think will make it to the end of this game, and who checkmates whom? Or are we no longer going to experience all this? Is Trump a democrat, republican or just a communist at all?

What means are used to play chess in this chess game?

Which chess pieces will this "world leader" use to increase his own image? Aren't we just dealing with a spoiled little boy, or a narcissist who was lucky that his father could buy half of Manhattan with relatively little money, making him suddenly very rich? Does this "president" think about what moves his possible opponents can make in this "game", or does he also think that he is playing chess with only little boys?

 Is Trump underestimating the chess skills of EU Leader Van der Leyen?

Okay, Trump thinks he has the largest war machine in the world at his disposal at the moment, but wasn't Goliath also defeated in his battle by the much smaller David? Isn't the "luck" factor completely forgotten or grossly underestimated in this game? If this scale game ends in a draw, will we then move on to the game called "war"? I am afraid that Trump, in all his vanity and narcissism, has forgotten the name Julius Robert Oppenheimer (April 22, 1904 – February 18, 1967), the man who is said to have developed the atomic bomb with Albert Einstein (Ulm, March 14, 1879 – Princeton, New Jersey, April 18, 1955). This atomic bomb once ended a chess game

Will a fatal countermove change the game of chess?

Do you ever think about which moves in the global "chess move" have changed our world for and for the worse? Think, for example, of the history of the "Trojan horse": When the Trojan War has been going on for ten years, the Greek hero Odysseus comes up with a ruse. He has a gigantic wooden horse built in which soldiers can hide. Thanks to this ruse, the Greeks eventually manage to defeat the Trojans. Think what would have happened if Napoleon hadn't been cut off at Waterloo by one of the first Dutch kings, allowing this king to marry a Russian Princess, and also end a chess game. Has Trump already forgotten the Second World War, in which his country represented a brave role, but which turned the whole world upside down and claimed many victims?

Is Elon Musk already making fewer moves?

There are already reports from America that fewer spectators are already watching Trump's chess game. Elon Musk already finds the "match" less interesting who follows him, and how does this match end, or what does the last move look like, do you know?

Challenging Authority: Lessons from Hitler, Putin, and Power

Roles can consume us, distorting our sense of self. True flexibility lies in balancing personal authenticity with external expectations. Challenging authority, together, can foster justice.

Yesterday I was sitting on the couch in the living room, looking ahead. I looked outside with staring eyes after an intense day for me. There's quite a lot going on around me right now, and I'm dealing with a lot of authoritarian people. People who, like you and me, play a role in everyday life.

Are you, like me, fairly flexible?

People who, like you and me, play a role in the life of the world are often unaware that it is only a role. In many cases, this role is completely separate from who they are as human beings. Unfortunately, these people are often unaware of this. These people often surrender completely to this role. By choosing a role, you often have to live according to the requirements that this "desired" role entails. After all, a role usually also includes a certain attitude and behavior that you very often let go of in your private life. Some people identify themselves with the profile of the job and maintain this attitude even after their working hours.

Do you have the role you want?

They love the respect that other people around them show them. Many people don't know these people well enough to know that this is the case, but are we talking about coping here? Coping means: Adapting your behavior to the other person, in order to be happy yourself, and to be able to stay happy. Many of these people lose sight of who they actually are because of the coping they use on a daily basis. Often, they don't know at all how others see them or think about them. Because they often behave forcedly, they can cause a lot of unrest in their environment. There are often many people who despise them and want nothing to do with them outside of the often-business interests.

Picture: linkedin

Do you know what others think about you?

These "others" often see you as an authority, or as the one who can exert a lot of influence on them. For example, if you are a civil servant, a teacher, or a manager of these people, they will often not dare to contradict you, so you will never really find out what they really think about you. If you think about this carefully, you probably recognize those people yourself, also in your environment. You probably know which people feel the same way about you. People you know disagree with you, but never contradict you. You will never know what they think about you, and you will never hear their real opinion of you, because they think they are too dependent on you.

Do you know any of these dependencies?

Unfortunately, we are all familiar with these dependencies. It only becomes difficult when people in their attitude, because of their position or level of education, consistently want to bend others to their will with a completely "wrong" attitude and behavior. I don't want to mention the Nazis, Romans and/or people of other faiths here, but these are examples of this, in my view, misplaced behavior. I think Hitler, Napoleon, Mussolini and maybe even Vladimir Putin are good examples of this, but fortunately these are only extremes. But they also started that way in their lives. Many "normal" people will often fear reprisals if they experience this type of behavior.

Could we have stopped Hitler and Putin in their behavior sooner?

You're probably familiar with the term "followers"? Do you often think about the possible consequences of giving pushback to someone who has to or can decide on matters that are important to you? Civil servants, teachers or doctors, people who can often change your future with the click of a mouse? A well-known saying is often something that people like you and I think about: "Arrogance often comes before a fall." But who in their environment is brave enough to bring about that fall? Who is the one who, despite the possible negative consequences, "Keeps his back straight?" Who still believes in righteousness in this life?

Do you think life is just?

Picture: Vladimir Putin, Wikipedia

What I find funny about this situation is that in practice, there are very few who dare to take on this challenge. In my experience, there are few known "whistleblowers" who have escaped without damage. This is happening, in my opinion, because there are so few Whistleblowers standing up currently. There are relatively few of them, and those few are crushed by the often university-educated opponents. They cover each other's backs just a little too often in my opinion. If people stand up in unison against these coping-overwhelmed types, the outcome may well be a revolution in which heads eventually roll. Just think of Marie Antoinette and Louis the Sixteenth who ended up on the scaffold. It probably won't take off that quickly, but I suggest challenging the current orders a little more. Connect with like-minded people and go for your own happiness, what do you think about this?