Can Trump End the Ukraine War? Risks to Europe & NATO?

As the 2024 U.S. election approaches, many are turning to Donald Trump as a solution to their frustrations. Trump claims he could end the war in Ukraine within days, but how realistic is this? This article explores whether Trump’s "America First" approach could make him a hero to Ukraine or jeopardize Europe’s future security and NATO’s strength.

Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign promises to end the war in Ukraine quickly, but his approach raises questions about Europe’s future security. With Trump’s “America First” stance, Europe may face a weakened U.S. commitment to NATO. This article explores Trump’s foreign policy, the risks to European defense, and whether Russia could expand its influence in Europe.

Will Donald Trump Become the Hero of the Ukrainian People?

As the 2024 U.S. election approaches, many are turning to Donald Trump as a solution to their frustrations. Trump claims he could end the war in Ukraine within days, but how realistic is this? This article explores whether Trump’s "America First" approach could make him a hero to Ukraine or jeopardize Europe’s future security and NATO’s strength.

Trump’s Unfulfilled Promises and the War in Ukraine

One of the most striking claims made by Donald Trump during his 2024 campaign is that he could bring an end to the war between Russia and Ukraine “in a matter of days.” While this bold statement might appeal to voters seeking a quick resolution, Trump has provided little detail on how he intends to achieve such a feat. His prior presidency was marked by a more isolationist foreign policy, raising questions about whether his promises to resolve the conflict are more about political rhetoric than feasible action.During his first term, Trump voiced criticism of U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts, particularly in Europe. He often expressed skepticism about NATO and suggested that European countries should take more responsibility for their own security. Trump’s "America First" stance, focusing on reducing American military commitments abroad, has led some to believe that his approach to the Ukraine war would be similarly hands-off.

Can Trump Keep His Promises? Will He End the War?

For those who have placed their hope in Trump, the promise to end the war in Ukraine represents the desire for a swift resolution. However, the war is complex, rooted in deep historical, political, and territorial issues that cannot be solved with a simple agreement. Ukraine’s fight is fundamentally about sovereignty and territorial integrity, which makes any negotiated peace far more difficult than Trump's bold rhetoric suggests.

Trump’s claim that he could quickly resolve the war in Ukraine may, unfortunately, be wishful thinking. A real solution would require intricate diplomacy, military strategy, and international pressure, none of which can be delivered with a simple negotiation. Furthermore, Trump’s past isolationist policies—particularly his doubts about NATO—could alienate European allies who view the United States as a critical partner in countering Russian aggression.

Europe’s Security: Has the U.S. Become a Weakened Ally?

For much of the 20th and 21st centuries, the United States has been a cornerstone of European security. After World War II, the U.S. played a central role in rebuilding Europe through initiatives like the Marshall Plan, and NATO became the bedrock of the continent’s defense. However, Trump’s rhetoric during his presidency and his current stance suggest that the U.S. may no longer be as committed to European security as it once was.If Trump were to return to power and implement policies that reduce U.S. involvement in international conflicts, particularly in Europe, Europe could find itself in a precarious situation. Without the full backing of the U.S., European nations might need to reassess their own defense capabilities. This could lead to a shift in the continent’s security strategy, including higher defense spending and perhaps even a greater degree of military independence. However, this would also expose Europe to significant vulnerabilities, especially if the U.S. were to reduce its support for NATO.

Will the "Cold War" Resurface?

Trump’s "America First" foreign policy, combined with Vladimir Putin’s aggressive actions, could lead to a renewed geopolitical divide. While we are not yet in a "new Cold War," the tensions that defined the first Cold War—great power rivalry, proxy conflicts, and nuclear deterrence—are re-emerging in different forms. A U.S. withdrawal from Europe, or a weakening of NATO, could reignite these tensions, particularly with Russia.The geopolitical environment has shifted in recent years, with China’s growing influence and Russia’s military actions. If Trump were to step back from European security, Russia could become more emboldened, potentially leading to a new arms race and escalating military tensions. For Europe, this would be a troubling prospect, especially considering the continent’s historical experience with conflict and instability.

Has Putin Misled the World?

Vladimir Putin’s military aggressions, particularly his invasion of Ukraine, have sparked fears of a resurgent Russia. But how powerful is Russia really? While Putin frequently boasts about his military’s capabilities, the ongoing war has exposed several weaknesses in Russia’s conventional forces. Despite having a formidable nuclear arsenal, Russia has struggled in Ukraine, facing logistical challenges, resistance from Ukrainian forces, and international sanctions.However, the fear of a stronger Russia is not entirely unfounded. NATO remains a powerful counterbalance, but if the U.S. were to reduce its commitment to European security, Russia might become more aggressive in pursuing its territorial ambitions. Europe, particularly countries in Eastern Europe, is already feeling the pressure and increasing defense spending in response to the perceived threat.

Will Russia Conquer Europe?

While it is unlikely that Russia will conquer all of Europe, the growing fear of Russian territorial expansion is palpable, especially in countries like Poland, the Baltic states, and Ukraine. These nations are especially vulnerable to Russian influence and military incursions. If the U.S. pulls back from Europe, Europe could find itself in a weaker position to resist Russian aggression.The question remains: can Europe defend itself without U.S. support? The EU has often struggled with military integration, and without NATO's collective defense framework, Europe would face a significant challenge in uniting its forces against a powerful adversary. The possibility of Russian expansion into Eastern Europe remains a legitimate concern, and without the backing of NATO, Europe could be left exposed.

Could Europeans Become Refugees in Their Own Land?

The ongoing war in Ukraine has already led to millions of refugees fleeing to Europe, but if Russia’s territorial ambitions extend beyond Ukraine, Europe could find itself in the midst of a much larger refugee crisis. If conflict spreads across the continent, it could lead to the displacement of millions of Europeans, reversing the flow of refugees Europe has seen in recent years.Additionally, the threat of nuclear conflict, while unlikely, cannot be ignored. Russia’s nuclear capabilities are well-documented, and while a full-scale nuclear war seems improbable, the risk of escalation—whether through conventional warfare or limited nuclear strikes—remains high. If conflict spreads to Europe, the consequences could be catastrophic.Is Trump’s Promise to End the War in Days a Reality?In conclusion, Donald Trump’s promise to end the war between Russia and Ukraine in just a few days seems highly unrealistic.

The war is far more complex than a quick resolution allows for, and any real peace would require careful diplomacy, military strategy, and international cooperation. While Trump’s “America First” policies may appeal to some, they could also undermine Europe’s security and destabilize the international order.Europe faces a critical decision: should it continue to rely on U.S. support for its defense, or should it take on more responsibility for its own security? If the U.S. reduces its role, Europe could face greater risks, especially with an increasingly aggressive Russia. Trump’s presidency could be a turning point for both Europe and the world, but whether he can deliver on his promises remains to be seen

Escapism vs Reality: Balancing Mental Health & Global Awareness Today

Many escape harsh realities through entertainment, but true resilience comes from awareness and engagement with global issues, balancing mental health and proactive societal involvement.

The Escapist's Dilemma: Confronting Reality in a World of Entertainment

In today's fast-paced, career-oriented society, many people are unknowingly engaged in a daily mental battle. They live in a reality crafted by streaming giants like Netflix and Disney+, a reality often

Picture: NPO Kennis

disconnected from the true state of the world. This raises an important question: Is it fear that drives people towards these platforms, or is the actual reality too daunting to face? Are they unable to banish the harsh truths of everyday life from their minds, even as they try to sleep?

The Proximity of Conflict

Is the specter of war becoming too close for comfort, or has it never really left our consciousness? Despite numerous global conflicts—such as those in Gaza, Israel, Serbia, and Russia—many people seem disengaged. Conversations about television often revolve around misery, politics, and excessive advertising, yet seldom touch on the fear of new wars. When discussing current world events, those engrossed in Netflix often claim ignorance or express a desire to avoid such topics. Their focus is on enjoying life, not dwelling on "pointless" conflicts. This attitude suggests a widespread disengagement from both local and global issues.

Today's world seems increasingly fragmented, with individuals living in isolated bubbles. At home, they live private lives, avoiding external input. At work, they do the minimum required, ensuring it benefits them sufficiently. There is a pervasive belief that everyone should mind their own business. When things go wrong, the onus is on others to have been more vigilant. This mindset implicitly suggests that those who don't engage with platforms like Netflix are missing out, failing to take care of themselves.

The Justified Fear of Demons

Given the ongoing conflicts in Gaza, Israel, Russia, and Serbia, and the significant political involvement and sponsorship of these wars, the threat of escalation is real. Daily warnings abound, echoing the sentiments of those who lived through previous wars. For many older individuals, the memories of war remain vivid, disturbing their peace even at night. For these people, sleep often comes only with the aid of pills or other substances.

The horrors of war extend far beyond the battlefield. As illustrated in the book "Silent Fathers," written by the son of a World War II labor camp survivor, the trauma experienced during conflict often results in long-lasting psychological scars. The father's nightmares and silent suffering were passed down to his son, illustrating the profound and enduring impact of war trauma. The atrocities witnessed and endured left lifelong marks, not just on the victims but also on their families.

Disconnection from Global Issues

There is a growing concern that many people are becoming increasingly disconnected from global issues. This could be attributed to information overload, where the constant barrage of negative news leads to desensitization or deliberate avoidance. What might be perceived as selfishness could also be a form of self-preservation. Constant exposure to distressing news can be psychologically draining, leading individuals to prioritize their mental health by focusing on more immediate and controllable aspects of their lives.

It's unfortunate that so few people engage with these powerful stories or read books that highlight the lasting impact of war. The experiences of those who survived horrific labor camps should serve as a stark reminder and motivation to intervene in emerging conflicts. Yet, many prefer to escape into the worlds offered by Netflix, Disney+, and HBO. These platforms often feature violent and war-themed content, providing a sanitized version of reality that remains comfortably distant.

Escapism and Media Consumption

Many people turn to entertainment as a form of escapism. It provides a temporary refuge from the overwhelming realities of the world, including wars and political strife. This can be driven by fear or anxiety about current events or simply a desire to find joy and relaxation amidst the chaos. The allure of curated, often idealized worlds on platforms like Netflix or Disney+ contrasts sharply with the often harsh and chaotic reality. People may prefer these narratives because they offer control and resolution, unlike the unpredictable and unresolved nature of real-world conflicts.

Preparing for the Next Conflict

While these films and series may entertain, they do little to prepare people for the actual horrors of war. Reality, with its complexities and brutality, often proves more terrifying than fiction. As such, those who rely on entertainment as a means of escape might find themselves unprepared for real-world traumas, forced to process their experiences in silence.

The Psychological Impact of War

The psychological scars of war, as illustrated in the book "Silent Fathers," often linger long after the physical conflict ends. These traumas can affect not only those who experienced the war directly but also subsequent generations. The adage "prevention is better than cure" holds significant weight when it comes to conflict. Understanding and remembering the past, as well as recognizing the signs of emerging conflicts, are crucial steps in preventing future atrocities. Yet, the challenge lies in maintaining awareness and action in a world where many prefer to avert their eyes.

Balancing Awareness and Mental Health

It is important to strike a balance between staying informed about global events and protecting one's mental health. This balance can be challenging but is necessary to foster a more empathetic and proactive society. Encouraging people to engage with real-world issues, perhaps through more accessible and compelling storytelling, can bridge the gap between escapism and awareness. Developing psychological resilience can help individuals face harsh realities without being overwhelmed. This can be achieved through education, community support, and fostering open discussions about difficult topics.

What will be you choice?

In these turbulent times, the choice between engagement and escapism is more critical than ever. While entertainment offers a necessary respite, it is essential to remain aware and proactive about the world's challenges. Learning from the past, building resilience, and promoting awareness can help bridge the gap between escapism and reality. By confronting these issues head-on, we can better prepare for whatever the future holds.

Russian Soldier Defects After Commander Shooting: War Ethics Debate

A Russian soldier's shocking act—shooting her commander and fleeing to Ukraine—challenges military loyalty, ethics, and the ever-persistent war industry.

Would it be surprising if a Russian soldier suddenly shot her own army commander? This act of defiance, whether driven by impulse or careful planning, carries deep implications. The soldier fled towards the Ukrainian army, a move that hints at a rejection of the conflict her country is waging. This raises critical questions about “military loyalty”, "discipline", and the consequences of such an act.

Facing the Death Penalty: Military Justice

In the rigid hierarchy of the military, insubordination—especially the extreme act of turning a weapon on a superior—often results in severe punishment. “Military law” typically allows little room for mercy, and the “death penalty” is a common consequence in such cases. The fact that this soldier fled towards Ukraine might have been a desperate attempt to escape immediate execution. However, her fate remains uncertain. This incident forces us to consider the ethical implications of “military justice” in the modern world, especially as society increasingly questions the “morality of the death penalty”.

The Military: A Dictatorship Within a Democracy?

The “military” operates as a separate entity within the broader society, governed by its own strict set of rules. The “chain of command” and the necessity of “obedience” create an environment where the individual’s moral compass can be overshadowed by the demand for absolute loyalty. This incident of a soldier turning against her commander challenges the foundation of “military discipline” and brings into focus the “authoritarian nature” of military institutions. Can such rigid structures coexist with the broader democratic values of “personal freedom” and “human rights”?

War Cemeteries in Normandy: A Reflection on Sacrifice

A visit to the “Normandy war cemeteries” offers a poignant reminder of the human cost of military obedience. The “Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial”, with its 9,387 meticulously maintained graves, reflects the deep respect given to those who died in service to their country. The “preservation of history” is evident in the care given to these sites, highlighting the value placed on “military sacrifice”. However, the stark contrast with the “La Chambre German Cemetery” raises questions about the “value of life” on opposing sides. The subdued design and communal graves at La Chambre suggest a different narrative, one where the tragedy of war is shared collectively rather than celebrated individually.

Equality in Death: A Question of Moral Value

The disparity between the American and German war cemeteries highlights uncomfortable truths about how we remember the dead. Are the lives of soldiers from one nation worth more than those from another? This question of “moral equivalence” is brought into sharp focus when we consider that some German graves hold multiple soldiers, a stark contrast to the individualized graves of their American counterparts. The “ethics of war” demand that we consider whether all lives lost in conflict deserve equal respect and remembrance, regardless of the side on which they fought.

The Tyranny of War: Obedience Versus Conscience

The Russian soldier’s decision to shoot her commander and flee suggests a profound internal conflict. Perhaps she recognized the futility of the war in Ukraine, driven more by “political power” than by any just cause. This act of defiance reflects a struggle between **

“obedience” and “conscience”—a dilemma faced by many soldiers throughout history. The “moral ambiguity” of war, especially one as contentious as the Russia-Ukraine conflict, forces us to question the justifications given for such violence and the “responsibility” of soldiers to reject orders they deem unjust.

The War Industry: Perpetuating Conflict

The ongoing production of weapons and the rise in “military-industrial complex” profits suggest that war is, unfortunately, a thriving business. If “weapons manufacturing” continues, so too will conflicts around the world. The economic interests tied to the war industry often perpetuate violence, raising ethical questions about the “commodification of war”. If we wish to see an end to such conflicts, the “global community” must take a stand against the industries that profit from death and destruction.

Conclusion: A Call for Universal Remembrance

In the end, the story of this Russian soldier is a stark reminder of the complexities of war. It challenges us to think about the nature of “military authority”, the value of human life, and the role of personal morality in the face of “military orders”. As we reflect on the sacrifices made by soldiers on all sides of conflicts, we must also consider the ethical implications of how we remember them. Whether through equal treatment in death or through the rejection of the “war industry”, the global community has a responsibility to uphold the dignity of all who are caught in the crossfire of war.

“Queen” Professor Nadia Helmy: Courageous Advocate for Truth in Chinese Politics

In an era where honesty is often sidelined, my friend Professor Nadia Helmy exemplifies true courage. Specializing in Chinese politics and residing in Egypt, Nadia continues to provide ethical and insightful analysis despite significant risks. Her commitment to truth, akin to figures like Nelson Mandela, is vital for global understanding and peace. I deeply admire her bravery and dedication.

Can you still vaguely remember the meaning of the word honesty, or what it means to "dare to give your opinion honestly"? Honestly, I increasingly wonder if humanity still values honest people around them. Do you still dare to tell the truth to someone's face today? It seems as if there's an embargo or even criminal prosecution for doing so. Well, the beautiful invention of marketing by Philip Kotler and others is one factor that has taught us to think commercially: to ask the right questions and ensure we don't immediately reveal everything to the other person.

Are you still as frank with everyone as ever?

Being candid, telling your story by an open campfire with a good glass of beer or wine—who remembers this from their recent past? I'm discovering more and more that the truth is often elusive. For the last few decades, it seems schools have taught students that you can't just tell the truth. Maybe the rationale was that you shouldn't hurt people unnecessarily, but still, who benefits from lies? I've known for years that we humans don't truly communicate; we merely emit sounds at each other—tones of different pitches, from which the other person then derives meaning. Strictly speaking, we rely much more on facial expressions to understand each other.

Are lies also told in politics?

"You don't have to lie to avoid telling the truth,” my mother, who sadly died far too early, used to say to me. So, you can legitimately withhold things, as often happens in business negotiations. But what about politics? A very

good friend of mine, Nadia Helmy, is an extremely friendly lady who studied political science in Sweden and now lives in Giza, Egypt, specializing in China. Despite all the negatives in Chinese policy, she also sees the better sides. She is very knowledgeable about the ins and outs of this country. She now has 16,908 followers on LinkedIn, of which I am one, and is also a member of the LinkedIn group "Semper Simul," which I founded in January 2024 and already has eight hundred members. I founded the group because I understand from my giftedness and high sensitivity that we are all connected in this big world.

Will Semper Simul (Always Together) remain a dream, or will it ever become our reality?

I regularly speak to Professor Nadia via LinkedIn or WhatsApp and hear about the political battles she faces because she speaks the truth and wants everyone to benefit from it. But there's a law of "Medes and Persians," mentioned even in the Bible, that not everyone is always happy with the truth. Even the most well-grounded stories told by a professor are often not accepted by those who don't want them to be true. Stories that you and I now know to be true are often colored differently for political reasons.

How many different colors of pens do you have?

It seems as if all those stories are written with different colored pens. Surely, we can assume that Professor Nadia Helmy produces well-founded and ethically responsible stories in the press and other media. Yet her life is seriously threatened from various political sides. Many times, she is no longer sure of her safety. She is particularly saddened because she is very sincere and honest.

Time and again, she rises from these life-threatening situations because she wants to continue proclaiming the truth, a truth I also believe is crucial for peace on our earth. With this story, I want to show my deep respect for the professor and the woman she is. In my mind, I would place her among the likes of Bishop Tutu, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King, and Elvis Presley, all people of faith who were aware of the inequality still present on our earth.

Nadia Helmy, a celebrity of her kind?

I hope we can all support her for a long time from the comfort of our armchairs in front of the television or radio. It takes a lot of courage to do what Professor Nadia does every day for us and the rest of the world. I would love to shake her hand in person one day and thank her for everything she has already done for us as citizens of the world. Thanks to her, we can see both the bad and the good sides of China and its people.

I invite you to greet her and thank her for all her good work at the universities of Beijing and Cairo. Thank you, Associate Professor Nadia Helmy.


Woodland Retreat Rich in Historical Heritage, Royal Neighbours, and Anna Paulowna’s Legacy

Picture: Anna Pawlowna: Bron : Historiek

My loyal readers will know by now that I live with my wife Monique and our two kittens, Rose and Joey, and our puppy Pip in the beautiful, wooded area of princely Baarn. This is a place in the Netherlands where part of the Dutch royal family also resides. It is a picturesque, wooded area nestled between the more famous Dutch cities of Utrecht and Amsterdam. In the past, the old nobility who lived in these big cities liked to retreat here to escape the stresses of urban life. These wealthy individuals preferred to travel by horse and cart, turning a journey of thirty kilometers as the crow flies into a trip that could sometimes take days.

Do you ever take a trip to green nature?

Baarn boasts many colossal houses and castles from this affluent past, where these noblemen used to reside. Practically speaking, we are almost neighbors with Princess Beatrix, the former Queen of the Netherlands. Just one garden away lies the world-famous Soestdijk Palace. In earlier years, King William II lived here with the beautiful Russian Grand Princess Anna-Paulowna (1795-1865), whom he was allowed to marry by the Russian Tsar Nicholas because he had outwitted the French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte at Waterloo. Did you know that her father, Paul Romanov, died when this beautiful princess was six years old? His brother Alexander was part of the assassination plot.

Indeed, a great Romanov in the beautiful Baarn nature. The landscape looked very different in earlier years. Many of the forests around Baarn were planted to provide timber for building large galleys for naval battles. Nature, in my eyes, is our greatest treasure. The oxygen factory that we, as humanity, so desperately need to survive on our insanely beautiful Earth.

Do you ever worry about oxygen deprivation?

Oxygen seems to be becoming increasingly rare within our draughty circle. Listening to this beautiful Earth, which can take such good care of us, is often foreign to us as human beings. We have cultivated this world further and further according to our desires. If you pick up a history book on a beautiful sunny summer day, you can read that through the influence of you and me, and our "beloved" ancestors, much has been adapted to this beautiful planet in practical ways.

Does survival come at a price?

Currently, new insights are constantly emerging about humans and our Earth. The latest insights tell us that there were not very few people living on Earth as always thought, but that the people on Earth simply did not know of each other's existence. In many cases, "primitive people" "just" lived alongside each other. There is evidence that ancient man could pass each other without noticing. They lived in places where they could hunt well. Hunting was a way to survive. When the game became scarce in the place where they were staying at that time, they simply moved on to another spot.

Yes, that was the way of survival until a certain group discovered how to grow crops. As a result, they had to settle in a certain place to maintain these crops. These places became stopping points where more and more people settled. These people, in turn, cultivated these environments. The cultivation and development are still ongoing, because we, as humans, are driven to reproduce further and further. Why? Probably because our parents said so. So, man continued with his self-serving behavior. You know the rest: "Man adapted the earth more and more to his wishes."

Has man taken too much from the earth?

Man had to and wanted to survive according to his own ideas and had no time, and probably no insights, into what he was causing. The earth was deteriorating without these people from prehistoric times and those in the further development of time consciously noticing this. But you and I, currently? Well, the "economic powers-that-be" tell us through the best marketing messages that we must eat and live differently. The Catholic Church still believes that having children is one of the most important things in life. So, the world's population is expanding, and no one outside the Catholic Church knows why. The stock market is partly about turnover, but people mean more turnover, and rising shares.

"The rich are getting richer, and the poor are getting poorer." Healthy and "well" grown vegetables are becoming more and more expensive, and the food-producing companies based on the African mainland produce for the West. Contraceptives are also forbidden by the church there, so humanity continues to grow. Humanity continues to bend everything to its own will; it cultivates the earth according to its desires. I always learned from my parents that you must be content with what you have, but does the rest of humanity feel the same way? Survival and cultivation seem to be in our genes. We shape the earth according to our wishes, but was the earth ever meant for this? And is having children one of the most important things on our planet?

“Living in the Now: Eckhart Tolle’s Wisdom Amidst Vladimir Putin’s Global Uncertainty”

Explore how Eckhart Tolle's wisdom from "The Power of Now" helps navigate life's uncertainties amidst Vladimir Putin's geopolitical threats. Understand the importance of living in the present and making decisions without fear of an uncertain future.

Picture:: De Volkskrant

According to many of us, life on earth should be like a "soft-boiled egg." Meanwhile, all the rules by which you can achieve success on earth should be clear to everyone. Many years of school and work experience with and for people should have yielded a lot of knowledge and "knowhow." Of course, there will always be things that go differently than we expected, but ok, "that's life." Others say, "Life is the way it is, take advantage of it."

But what to do with tomorrow's uncertainties?

There is an author who has a very nice answer to that: "Eckhart Tolle" is his name, and he is especially praised for his book: "The Power of Now." In this book, Mr. Tolle explains that there is only one time to think about and that is now. You can't change what happened before. The time after the now is not yet clear to anyone. So you can only behave well now, now is what you see, and now is the time when you can show who you are and what your plans are. Anyone who asks you questions about the future can be pushed away because no one will ever know what the future will bring. Nobody has "a monopoly on wisdom." If the tragedy has ever begun, there are few people who can change it. Many claim to be able to think strategically, but do not understand that this is only a form of overestimation, in which fear is a recognizable guideline.

Are we indeed on the eve of the "Third World War?"

Vladimir Putin is one of the people who envisions a future for everyone on our planet. He has something in his head that can't be extracted from his brain with a thousand horsepower. Putin once saw a map from a few centuries ago that depicted a much larger Russia. Many Baltic states that have now built up an independent existence without Russia were still part of Russia on this old map. But Putin has a haze in front of his eyes and only sees his future. According to him, there does not seem to be any other future. In his statements and actions, he continues to make assertions about that future, the future about a free and powerful Russia, a country that rules the world.

How should you make decisions with a war in mind?

Eckhart Tolle is right, we live in the now, but if we are lucky, there will be many new "nows" for us. Every new day is a new now! When coming up with your new life goals, do you always consider a possible unexpected now? Do Vladimir Putin's words keep running through your head when you think about your new now? After all, what dreams can you build when you know that a Russian bomb could fall in your garden at any time of the next day? I hope you don't think about having children these days, do you? Or are you already thinking about decorating your new home that you will move into at the beginning of next year according to your current wishes? And indeed, there are also children's rooms in your plans.

Is Putin going to thwart your plans?

What are the chances that Putin will be able to throw your plans in the trash or move them? According to many, Putin is very smart. Putin is shouting, and he is making others shout things to see what the reaction of his expected opponents is to this! Putin keeps threatening, and what do we do? We have already drifted far away from our NOW in our heads, we only think about those things that we want to secure when Putin declares the long-awaited war. But what's the point for Putin to declare that war? Will his Now always float in the future? If he looks at a dot on the horizon at all, does this dot ever shift? Does Putin know the thoughts of his opponents, or does Vladimir Putin also live in the Now, and is he sponsored by the war industry? Have you also noticed that the countries in the EU are talking more and more about the arms race? That more and more of these countries feel that they should expand their armaments into a war arsenal.

Putin a good minister of war economy?

Putin pushes the buttons and everyone in the rest of the world shakes their heads no, but everyone thinks: "But if it's going to happen anyway." No one is in the now in their head right now. Everyone tells us what's going to happen if Putin gets it on his hips, but as Eckhart Tolle said before, the only truth is the "NOW." Why does everyone remain relatively calm under the bombs and grenades? Why is no one killing Vladimir Putin, are there people on this earth who know what he can do, and will do with our future? Are there many people whose future since Putin's intervention is no longer as they had imagined it to be? Would we all invest in the pockets of the already far too rich and influential war industry? Would Putin get a profit share in the sales of all that war equipment? If not, stop these unnecessary money-consuming war projects, and put Putin's mind in a shelter for strategists traumatized by war.