Intellectual Property Rights: Perspectives on Nature, Importance and Challenges in its Enforcement-Bird’s Eye View

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) form a vital legal framework that protects human creativity, innovation, and knowledge. This is crucial in the knowledge-driven global economy. This paper provides an overview of IPR, examining its nature, importance, and enforcement challenges. It outlines conceptual foundations, highlights major forms, and explains their roles in fostering innovation, encouraging investment, and promoting fair competition. Despite their growing relevance, IPR enforcement faces challenges such as digital piracy, lack of awareness, procedural delays, jurisdictional complexities, and inadequate institutional mechanisms. These issues are particularly notable in developing countries. By analysing these issues, the paper underscores the need for robust enforcement strategies, harmonised laws, and heightened stakeholder awareness. It concludes that effective IPR protection is necessary to support innovation, safeguard public interest, and ensure equitable global growth.

Introduction to IPR

Intellectual property (IP) is intangible creations of the human intellect. Intellectual property rights (IPR) play a crucial role in today’s knowledge-based society and innovation-driven global economy. It protects the rights of inventors, authors, designers, and artists, motivating them to invest time, effort, and resources in creating new ideas, products, processes, systems, and technologies [1-4]. It encourages creativity and innovation, protects original works, safeguards inventions/innovations, promotes economic growth and high-quality development, fosters fair competition, boosts research and development activities, facilitates technology transfer, enhances global trade and international recognition, improves consumer confidence and quality assurance, and supports cultural and social development. Robust IPR frameworks catalyse industrial expansion, enhance foreign direct investment inflows, and stimulate job creation across multiple sectors. IPR safeguards inventions, literary and artistic works, trademarks, and industrial designs from unauthorised use, copying, or exploitation. It ensures a level playing field for businesses and supports ethical trade practices by preventing imitation and counterfeiting. Legal protection through patents and copyrights encourages organisations to invest in research, thereby promoting technological advancements. It enables licensing and commercialisation of innovations, allowing technologies to reach wider markets and benefit society. It has become essential for international trade with globalisation. Trademarks help consumers identify genuine products and services, ensuring quality and trust. In the digital era, IPR has become vital for protecting online creations and combating piracy amid rapid advancements in software, artificial intelligence (AI), and digital content. Copyright protection not only preserves cultural heritage but also encourages the continued growth of literature, music, films, and art. Performers’ rights, database rights, and design rights also come under IPR. Thus, IPR is essential for fostering innovation, economic progress, and global competitiveness, while considering the interests of creators and society. The scope of this article is limited to presenting a bird’s-eye view of the broad perspectives on the nature and importance of IPR, highlighting its significance for a wider audience, and the challenges in its enforcement to inspire positive change.

Types of IPR

The main types of IPRs, protecting creations of the mind, include patents (inventions), trademarks (brands/logos), copyrights (artistic/literary works), and trade secrets (confidential information) [5-8]. Other key types include industrial designs, geographical indications, and plant variety rights, safeguarding different forms of innovation, creativity, and branding. Each of these types of IPR guard different creations with unique scopes, durations, and registration requirements, fostering innovation by granting exclusive rights for a limited time or indefinitely if kept secret: i) patents grant exclusive rights to inventors for new innovations (products or processes) for a limited time, preventing others from making, using, or selling the invention. ii) Trademarks protect brand names, logos, slogans, and other signs that distinguish goods or services from competitors, ensuring brand identity and consumer trust. iii) Copyrights safeguard original creative works like books, music, films, software, and art, giving creators exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and display them. iv) trade secrets cover confidential business information (formulas) that provide a competitive edge, requiring the owner to keep it secret. v) Industrial designs protect the ornamental or aesthetic aspects of an article, such as its shape, pattern, or colour. vi) geographical indications identify a product as originating from a specific place, where quality, reputation, or characteristics are due to that origin (Darjeeling Tea) vii) plant variety rights protect new plant varieties developed by breeders and viii) Semiconductor layout designs protect the three-dimensional layout of integrated circuits. These rights provide legal protection for intangible assets, helping creators and businesses control and benefit from their innovations and brands.

IPR Implications

An IP value chain involves innovation, portfolio management (IP protection and management), and commercialisation (financial tracking and licensing). IPR significantly drives economic growth, innovation, and R&D by granting creators exclusive rights, encouraging investment, and allowing monetisation of ideas through patents, copyrights, and trademarks [9-12]. They foster competition, attract foreign investment, and help develop new technologies, but require comprehensive and balanced laws and enforcement, as well as targeted competition regulation to prevent monopoly. This ensures both creator protection and public access to knowledge, promoting sustained societal and economic progress. It provides incentives for individuals and businesses to invest time and resources in creating new products, technologies, and art, securing returns on investment. IPR boosts economic growth by transforming ideas into profitable ventures, driving industrial expansion, creating employment opportunities, and enhancing national competitiveness. Strong IPR frameworks attract foreign direct investment by safeguarding intellectual assets and enabling seamless technology transfer. They allow creators to license, sell, or generate royalties from their IP, increasing company value and market presence. It also protects consumers from inferior or pirated goods and ensures fair payment for creators, supporting quality content industries. The role of IPR in entrepreneurship involves encouraging innovation, competition, protecting investments, and international implications. A grand vision of dramatic growth and impressive performance in IP creation by public and private sectors can be realised by building world-class research infrastructure, creating attractive inventor incentives, establishing academic-industry research partnerships, and developing a robust IP culture within the country.

Potential negative/corrosive impacts and challengesinclude the risk of monopolies hindering further innovation, diversity of thought, and access to essential knowledge, particularly in developing nations. It can often impede sequential innovation in certain sectors, such as electronics. Weak enforcement can undermine the system, while complex international regulations can be challenging for smaller entities. Key mechanisms include granting exclusive rights for new inventions for a limited time (20 years for patents), protecting original artistic, literary, and musical works through copyrights, safeguarding brand names, logos, and symbols via trademarks, and protecting confidential business information and trade secrets. In essence, IPR acts as a vital tool for economic development, but its effectiveness hinges on finding an optimal balance that encourages creativity without stifling progress, requiring robust yet flexible legal frameworks. The impact of IPR piracy includes ethical considerations, economic implications, creativity and innovation, quality control, consumer safety, global implications, and local cultural impact.

Complexity and Diversity

Patents exhibit significant complexity, such as longer documents (specifications), a greater number of claims, intricate technological details, and diversity, such as various types like utility, design, plant, differing technological fields, unique strategies for exploitation, reflecting growing innovation, deeper technical integration, and varied business goals [13-15]. Detailed descriptions in patent documents and numerous claims per patent indicate broader protection sought. Modern inventions with technological depth make it difficult for examiners to assess complex interconnections. Understanding inter-claim relationships and defining invention is complex in the legal context. These aspects make them challenging for examiners and portfolio managers, while offering broad societal technology information, but increasing grant difficulty. Patent diversity encompasses various types beyond standard utility patents, design patents (protecting aesthetics), plant patents (protecting new plant varieties), and provisional patents (serving as placeholders), each with unique rules and purposes. Technological diversity spans all sectors, from software and biotechnology to mechanics, with examiners needing broad expertise or teamwork with a strong scientific spirit. Strategic diversity for internal product focus or licensing by firms leads to varied portfolio structures and an impact on profitability. Furthermore, patents are territorial, requiring separate filings in different countries, thereby adding administrative diversity. The interplay of complexity in the innovation landscape (incremental/disruptive/breakthrough) and increased diversity in technological approaches (trade diversification) drives complexity in patent applications. This sheer volume of diverse, complex art (prior inventions) and the intricate claims within applications create examination challenges. Managing a diverse portfolio of complex patents requires sophisticated strategies to influence firm performance. Furthermore, violations of IPR, including patent, copyright, and trademark infringement, as well as the misappropriation of trade secrets, may constitute either civil or criminal offences, depending on the type of IP involved, the jurisdiction, and the nature of the conduct. 

 Small, continuous improvements to existing products/services/processes, such as incremental innovations, those that create new markets and disruptive innovations, are categorised by their market impact and technology use. Incremental innovation is evolutionary for existing markets, while breakthrough and disruptive innovations are revolutionary, often using new technology to entirely transform industries. Incremental innovation builds on the present, while breakthrough and disruptive ones create a new future by challenging the status quo. Similarly, scientific inventions can be categorised by their impact and stage of development as breakthroughs (foundational discoveries), their subsequent extensions (extension inventions/development and refinement), and their eventual industrial applications (widespread use and commercialisation). Technology and AI offer powerful tools to safeguard and expand traditional knowledge (TK), provided ethical principles guide their integration, fostering innovation rooted in cultural wisdom. The R&D output is limited, particularly in developing countries, due to a lack of high-end research facilities, constraints imposed by slow bureaucratic processes in research project approvals, a shortage of industry-sponsored research projects/incubation centres, and a deficit in the R&D expenditure-to-GDP ratio aimed at targeting frontier science and technologies.

IPR in India

The primary purpose of IP laws is to encourage the creation of a broad range of intellectual goods, stimulate innovation, and contribute to technological progress. These laws grant individuals and businesses property rights to the information and intellectual property they create, typically for a limited period. They enable creators to protect their original ideas, prevent unauthorised copying, and obtain financial benefits from their inventions. IPR in India refers to legal protections for creations of the mind, like patents, trademarks, copyrights, and designs, governed by acts such as the Patents Act, 1970, and Copyright Act, 1957, crucial for successful innovators and businesses to gain exclusive rights, foster innovation, and ensure economic returns, with the Startup India portal offering schemes to help startups protect their IP [16-18]. India's framework aligns with global standards, such as the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), which covers a diverse range of areas, including software and plant varieties, and is administered by bodies under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry.

Key types of IPR in India include patents, trademarks, and copyrights. A patent is a government-granted legal right that allows an inventor to exclude others from making, using, selling, or importing an invention for a limited period of time. An invention is a solution to a specific technological problem (product/process/system), generally fulfilling the main requirements of novelty (uniqueness), non-obviousness (inventive solution), and industrial applicability (utility-based inventions). A patent filing process includes the following steps: i) identify the office of jurisdiction, ii) drafting patent specification in techno-legal language, iii) provide necessary documents and filled forms, as complete or provisional, iv) physical/e-filing of document, v) patent application publication, vi) request for examination, vii) responding to objections/examination report, and viii) patent grant. Copyright protects literary, artistic, and musical works, software, and films. Other key types of IPR in India include industrial designs for protecting the visual appearance of products, geographical indications (GI) to identify products originating from a specific region, trade secretstosafeguardundisclosed valuable business information, and plant varieties to protect new plant breeds. Importance for startups and businesses includes a competitive edgeto protect uniqueness and build long-term value, financial returns, allowing licensing and preventing unauthorised use, as well as government supportthrough schemes like the Scheme for Facilitating Start-ups IP Protection (SIPP), thereby facilitating registration for startups. 

The WIPO Global Innovation Index (GII) 2025 report ranks India as 38^th [19]. India is enhancing its IP framework to align with global trends, though challenges such as R&D spending persist in the current context (~ 0.7 % GDP). However, it is essential to re-examine policy decisions and reimagine institutional and legal frameworks, social priorities, societal impact, and ecological change, thereby fostering a robust patent culture and addressing developmental challenges, as IPR play a crucial role in shaping our lives and future. It is essential to incorporate clauses related to the use of artificial intelligence capabilities and associated risks within the Indian patent framework [20]. A patent application should be sufficiently examined by a genuine domain expert who can discern cause and effect with a scientific temperament, analyse the content in line with global scientific and technological innovations, and inform decisions based on established scientific facts and their impacts on a broader society and ecology. A well-crafted patent regulation law, rather than a poorly designed and poorly enforced one, facilitates investment and innovation from both domestic and international companies, as well as home-grown developers. It is essential to resolve structural problems within the innovation ecosystem and bring out fundamental changes in the higher education system to become research centres of excellence and generate high-value research outputs. The research, development, and innovation (RDI) framework should be strengthened, incentives for breakthrough innovations must be provided, technology transfer and commercialisation must be driven, and strategic investment in R&D in specific domains must be enhanced to accelerate the engine of next-generation technological power and a major innovation hub.

Concluding Comments

IPR include copyright, geographical indications, industrial design rights, patents, plant variety rights, trade dress, trademarks, and trade secrets. As discussed above, IPR topics cover various areas like patents (pharma, AI, biotechnology), copyright (digital piracy, fair use, orphan works, creative commons), trademarks (cybersquatting, brand protection, non-conventional marks, GIs), and trade secrets (non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), enforcement), often focusing on modern challenges in technology (Generative AI, Blockchain), international law, and enforcement (border, digital), with specific discussions around Indian law, compulsory licensing, and traditional knowledge. There is a need to strongly conceptualise and contextualise the patentability of stem cells/biotechnology innovations, software and business method patents, compulsory licensing in the pharmaceutical field, patent enforcement, prior art, utility models, and patent systems. The copyright domain requires expanded study to encompass digital piracy and infringement in cyberspace, orphan works and limitations/exceptions, transformative works (including AI and copyright), fair use and fair dealing defences, moral rights, and Creative Commons, as well as their implications for policy and practice. There is a need to advance scholarship significantly in trademarks and designs, including geographical indications (GIs) for products, non-conventional trademarks (sound, shape), cybersquatting and domain name disputes, trade dress protection, comparative advertising, industrial designs, and prior protection. Cross-cutting and emerging issues also need to be carefully explored in broad disciplinary and institutional spheres, including AI-generated content, AI in IP, IP management on blockchain, traditional knowledge (TK) protection, IP valuation and commercialisation methods and strategies, border enforcement measures, digital enforcement, and international regimes/laws. Ultimately, it is necessary to consider broader perspectives beyond legal frameworks to develop sustainable solutions to the intellectual property challenges presented by the intersection of generative AI and copyright, particularly in light of their implications for achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Addressing these issues requires more than just the law alone and must ensure that human creativity continues to be valued and protected in the evolving era of machine learning.

References

1. Spinello, R. A. (2007). Intellectual property rights. Library Hi Tech, 25(1), 12-22.
2. Romer, P. (2002). When should we use intellectual property rights? American Economic Review, 92(2), 213-216.
3. Stiglitz, J. E. (2007). Economic foundations of intellectual property rights. Duke LJ, 57, 1693.
4. National Research Council, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, Applications, Computer Science, Telecommunications Board, & the Emerging Information Infrastructure. (2000). The digital dilemma: Intellectual property in the information age. National Academies Press.
5. Voss, T., Paranjpe, A. S., Cook, T. G., & Garrison, N. D. (2017). A short introduction to intellectual property rights. Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 20(2), 116-120.
6. Savale, S. K., & Savale, V. K. (2016). Intellectual property rights, World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci., 5(6), 2529-2559.
7. Pandey, N., & Dharni, K. (2014). Intellectual property rights. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
8. Sharma, D. K. (2014). Intellectual property and the need to protect it. Indian J. Sci. Res, 9(1), 084-087.
9. Juma, C. (1999). Intellectual property rights and globalisation: implications for developing countries. Science, Technology and Innovation Discussion Paper, 4.
10. Borg, E. A. (2001). Knowledge, information and intellectual property: implications for marketing relationships. Technovation, 21(8), 515-524.
11. Adams, S. (2008). Globalisation and income inequality: Implications for intellectual property rights. Journal of Policy Modelling, 30(5), 725-735.
12. Chapman, A. R. (2002). The human rights implications of intellectual property protection. Journal of International Economic Law, 5(4), 861-882.
13. Shur-Ofry, M. (2013). IP and the Lens of Complexity. IDEA, 54, 55.
14. Naghavi, A., Spies, J., & Toubal, F. (2015). Intellectual property rights, product complexity, and the organisation of multinational firms. Canadian Journal of Economics, 48(3), 881-902.
15. Dreyling, J. (2021). Institutional Complexity and Opportunity Structures: Weaker Actor Influence in International Intellectual Property Regulation. Global Policy, 12, 37-46.
16. Zambad, S., & Londhe, B. R. (2014). To study the problems faced by innovator from the conception idea to filling patent in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 829-837.
17. Zade, M. S., Tamboli, F. A., Salunkhe, A. A., Kore, M. D., More, A. D., & Ghadge, Y. R. (2023). Intellectual property rights (IPR): An overview. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Analysis, (10), 3.
18. Godinho, M. M., & Ferreira, V. (2012). Analysing the evidence of an IPR take-off in China and India. Research Policy, 41(3), 499-511.
19. https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/global-innovation-index-2025/en/gii-2025-results.html
20. Cubert, J. A., & Bone, R. G. (2018). The law of intellectual property created by artificial intelligence. In Research handbook on the law of artificial intelligence. Edward Elgar Publishing, 411-427.