Mandela, Gandhi, and Obama showed true leadership beyond wealth.

Many aspire to managerial roles for power and salary, but true leadership, exemplified by figures like Nelson Mandela, Gandhi, and Obama, goes beyond wealth. Leadership is about character, vision, and the ability to inspire others. Financial independence can help but isn't necessary. Effective leaders delegate, develop others, and focus on the greater good, not just personal gain. True leadership qualities are rare and often innate, as seen in leaders like Steve Jobs and Margaret Thatcher, who left lasting legacies by empowering those around them and leading with conviction.! Here's a version of the text that includes references to more famous leaders:


The Allure of Managerial Positions

The desire to attain a managerial position is a common aspiration among many professionals. The allure of such roles often stems from the perceived benefits associated with the title: higher salaries, increased influence, and the power to make decisions that shape the direction of a team or organization. Many believe that achieving a managerial position is synonymous with success, viewing it as a way to increase their personal and professional influence. However, the true essence of leadership, as demonstrated by figures like Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi, and Winston Churchill, is not solely tied to wealth, power, or title. Leadership is far more complex, requiring qualities that extend beyond financial independence or managerial authority.

Nelson Mandela: Leadership Beyond Wealth

Nelson Mandela, one of the most revered leaders in modern history, was not a man of great wealth. His influence and leadership did not stem from financial independence but from his unwavering commitment to justice, equality, and the well-being of his people. Mandela's leadership was characterized by his ability to inspire and unite others, even in the face of extreme adversity. He did not rely on money or power to lead; instead, he leveraged his moral authority and his ability to connect with people on a deep, emotional level. This example demonstrates that being rich is not a prerequisite for effective leadership. True leadership is about character, vision, and the ability to inspire others to work towards a common goal.

Gandhi and Churchill: Leading Through Conviction

Mahatma Gandhi and Winston Churchill, two iconic leaders of the 20th century, also exemplify leadership that transcends financial considerations. Gandhi, like Mandela, was not wealthy, yet he led India to independence through nonviolent resistance, driven by his deep moral convictions. Churchill, on the other hand, came from a more privileged background, but his leadership during World War II was marked by resilience and the ability to rally a nation under dire circumstances. Both leaders demonstrated that leadership is about more than just financial stability; it is about having the courage to stand by one’s principles and inspire others to do the same.

Does Financial Independence Enhance Leadership?

Financial independence can certainly provide a leader with more freedom to take risks and make bold decisions without the fear of immediate financial repercussions. A leader who does not have to worry about losing their job might feel more empowered to pursue innovative ideas or challenge the status quo. However, this does not mean that financial independence is a necessity for leadership. Many great leaders, like Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, and Mother Teresa, led transformative movements without the cushion of financial security. Their leadership was rooted in their convictions and their ability to mobilize others, not in their personal wealth.

The True Role of a Manager

The role of a manager, therefore, should not be viewed merely as a stepping stone to personal gain or increased power. Management is about enabling others to perform at their best, facilitating teamwork, and ensuring that organizational goals are met. A manager's primary responsibility is to support their team, provide guidance, and create an environment where everyone can succeed. This often involves delegating tasks, empowering team members, and trusting them to take ownership of their work. Effective delegation is a critical skill for any leader, as it not only helps distribute the workload but also develops the skills of others and prepares them for future leadership roles.

Obama’s Approach to Delegation

Barack Obama, during his presidency, was known for his ability to delegate effectively. He surrounded himself with a team of skilled advisors and trusted them to handle various aspects of governance. This approach allowed him to focus on the broader strategic vision for the country while ensuring that day-to-day operations were managed by capable individuals. Obama's willingness to delegate demonstrated his confidence in his team's abilities and his understanding that leadership is not about micromanaging but about empowering others to contribute their expertise.

The Risks of Centralized Control

In contrast, some leaders, like Donald Trump, have been criticized for a more autocratic style, where delegation is less common, and control is centralized. This approach can create an environment where subordinates are hesitant to take initiative or make decisions independently, fearing repercussions. While this style might work in certain contexts, it often stifles creativity and innovation, as team members may feel that their contributions are undervalued or that they are merely executing orders rather than collaborating on solutions.

The Importance of Developing Others

The fear of being overtaken or overshadowed by others is a common concern among managers. However, truly effective leaders recognize that their success is tied to the success of their team. By helping others grow and develop, a leader not only enhances the overall performance of the organization but also ensures a pipeline of future leaders who can continue to drive the organization forward. Leaders who are insecure about their position and try to hinder others' progress ultimately harm the organization by creating a toxic environment.

True Leadership Qualities Are Rare

Figures like Steve Jobs, Margaret Thatcher, and Nelson Mandela illustrate that true leadership qualities are indeed rare and often not learned from textbooks. These individuals possessed an innate ability to lead, inspire, and influence others in profound ways. Their leadership was not about maintaining their position but about making a lasting impact on their organizations, nations, or the world. True leaders understand that their role is to serve others, facilitate growth, and pave the way for future leaders. They recognize that leadership is not about self-preservation but about leaving a legacy that benefits others long after they are gone.


This revised version includes more examples of famous leaders to illustrate different aspects of leadership.

Letter of M K Gandhi To Adolf Hitler, On Desist of World War 2

mahatma gandhi letter to hitler

Every second human on this planet applauses on the skill of Gandhi on defeat his enemy. The political party of Gandhi were seeking not to defeat British rules but convert them into friendly behaviours. His amiable nature never considered or treated Britain as misanthropic.

Thus, this free advised was given to Hitler to give him a second thought on his monstrous acts which could have saved more than 70 to 80 millions human fatality ever noted on this earth planet in the World War 2 including 10 million people died due to genocide. World War II is generally considered to have begun on 1 September 1939

Gandhi's Letter to Hitler was written at Wardha and sent on December 24, 1940

As at Wardha,
December 24, 1940

DEAR FRIEND,
That I address you as a friend is no formality. I own no foes. My business in life has been for the past 33 years to enlist the friendship of the whole of humanity by befriending mankind, irrespective of race, colour or creed.
I hope you will have the time and desire to know how a good portion of humanity who have view living under the influence of that doctrine of universal friendship view your action.

We have no doubt about your bravery or devotion to your fatherland, nor do we believe that you are the monster described by your opponents. But your own writings and pronouncements and those of your friends and admirers leave no room for doubt that many of your acts are monstrous and unbecoming of human dignity, especially in the estimation of men like me who believe in universal friendliness.

Such are your humiliation of Czechoslovakia, the rape of Poland and the swallowing of Denmark. I am aware that your view of life regards such spoliations as virtuous acts. But we have been taught from childhood to regard them as acts degrading humanity. Hence, we cannot possibly wish success to your arms.
But ours is a unique position. We resist British Imperialism no less than Nazism. If there is a difference, it is in degree. One-fifth of the human race has been brought under the British heel by means that will not bear scrutiny. Our resistance to it does not mean harm to the British people. We seek to convert them, not to defeat them on the battle-field. Ours is an unarmed revolt against the British rule.

But whether we convert them or not, we are determined to make their rule impossible by non-violent non-co-operation. It is a method in its nature indefensible. It is based on the knowledge that no spoliator can compass his end without a certain degree of co-operation, willing or compulsory, of the victim. Our rulers may have our land and bodies but not our souls. They can have the former only by complete destruction of every Indian—man, woman and child.

That all may not rise to that degree of heroism and that a fair amount of frightfulness can bend the back of revolt is true but the argument would be beside the point. For, if a fair number of men and women be found in India who would be prepared without any ill will against the spoliators to lay down their lives rather than bend the knee to them, they would have shown the way to freedom from the tyranny of violence.

I ask you to believe me when I say that you will find an unexpected number of such men and women in India. They have been having that training for the past 20 years. We have been trying for the past half a century to throw off the British rule. The movement of independence has been never so strong as now.

The most powerful political organization, I mean the Indian National Congress, is trying to achieve this end. We have attained a very fair measure of success through non-violent effort. We were groping for the right means to combat the most organized violence in the world which the British power represents. You have challenged it. It remains to be seen which is the better organized, the German or the British.

We know what the British heel means for us and the non-European races of the world. But we would never wish to end the British rule with German aid. We have found in non-violence a force which, if organized, can without doubt match itself against a combination of all the most violent forces in the world. In non-violent technique, as I have said, there is no such thing as defeat. It is all ‘do or die’ without killing or hurting.

It can be used practically without money and obviously without the aid of science of destruction which you have brought to such perfection. It is a marvel to me that you do not see that it is nobody’s monopoly. If not the British, some other power will certainly improve upon your method and beat you with your own weapon. You are leaving no legacy to your people of which they would feel proud.

They cannot take pride in a recital of cruel deed, however skilfully planned. I, therefore, appeal to you in the name of humanity to stop the war. You will lose nothing by referring all the matters of dispute between you and Great Britain to an international tribunal of your joint choice. If you attain success in the war, it will not prove that you were in the right. It will only prove that your power of destruction was greater. Whereas an award by an impartial tribunal will show as far as it is humanly possible which party was in the right.
You know that not long ago I made an appeal to every Briton to accept my method of non-violent resistance. I did it because the British know me as a friend though a rebel. I am a stranger to you and your people. I have not the courage to make you the appeal I made to every Briton. Not that it would not apply to you with the same force as to the British.

But my present proposal is much simple because much more practical and familiar. During this season when the hearts of the peoples of Europe yearn for peace, we have suspended even our own peaceful struggle. Is it too much to ask you to make an effort for peace during a time which may mean nothing to you personally but which must mean much to the millions of Europeans whose dumb cry for peace I hear, for my ears are attended to hearing the dumb millions?

I had intended to address a joint appeal to you and Signor Mussolini, whom I had the privilege of meeting when I was in Rome during my visit to England as a delegate to the Round Table Conference. I hope that he will take this as addressed to him also with the necessary changes.

I am,
Your sincere friend,
M. K. GANDHI

Read more about how the conversation between young daughter (India Gandhi's letters) convey the messages to her father Nehru. The truth about, Love In Practice is painful when Hikmet convey through letter to his wife.

Nathuram Godse: History will weigh my act and find the true value

"Nathuram Godse's recorded statement. He was carrying fire in the heart of being a true man of Hindutva and proved his firmness on his decision and plan. Godse is the one who had terminated the father of India down on 30th Jan 1948 (17:17 IST) and had left the entire nation in shock."


Who killed Gandhi?

The First question in the head of any individual (in a new developed brain) would die to know, let it be Indian or from another countries. Upon hearing the name of accuse, Nathuram Godse and second question might appear “why?”, Nathu is the only one who could tell us. But he was sentenced to (death) hang on 15 Nov 1949 in Ambala jail.

“I Would Like To Add That I Do Not Desire Any Mercy To Be Shown To Me, Nor Do I Wish That Anyone Else Should Beg For Mercy On My Behalf.”

Nathuram Godse

Why I killed Gandhi?

Natthram Godse
The trial of persons accused of participation and complicity in Mahatma Gandhi's assassination opened in the Special Court in Red Fort Delhi on May 27, 1948. A Close up of the accused persons. Left to right front row: Nathuram Vinayak Godse, Narayan Dattatraya Apte and Vishnu Ramkrishna Karkar. Seated behind are (from left to right) Diganber Ram Chandra Badge, Shankar s/o Kistayya, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, Gopal Vinayak Godse and Dattatrays Sadashiv Parachure. (pc - Wikipedia)

The book written by Nathuram Godse. Seems like planned and plotted murder of Gandhi. Why someone would want to tell the reasons behind the assassination of Gandhi in a book to know the entire world, “why I did it”. Why was none of the person, not at all listen to Godse during hearings in the court? Neither he wanted a favour or mercy to show on him.

All the questions being asked and answered in this book. The book is written by Nathuram Godse’s real brother Gopal Godse. It has the original statement given by Nathuram Godse. The writer narrates all the events that occurred takes us through the day of assassination till the day Nathu was hanged.

Nathuram was born (19 May 1910) in a Brahmin family, a Hindu Nationalism, in Pune. His parents believed bearing a male child was cursed so far in his family. All three brothers of Nathuram died in their early childhood. He was fourth and to avoid succession of death, his parents (father, Vinayak Vamanrao Godse and his mother, Godavari) named him Ramchandra, but parents raised Nathu like a girl until his younger brother born. Thus, he got a nickname, Nathuram (Nath — piercing on the nose of a woman and Ram comes from his real name, Ramchandra).

Nathu’s (past member of Rashtria Swayamsewak Sangh) karma killing Gandhi mostly triggered by deviating decision (during the partition) and thoughts of Gandhi, as per his statements and opinions, if Gandhi did not protest withheld 55 crores to Pakistan, Gandhi could have saved from being assassin of Godse. Not only this but there are some other factors which are also linked with Partition of India into India and Pakistan, and aftermath. Godse was a part of a radical group of Hindu Nationalism (mainly express social and political thoughts) who shot three bullets in the chest of Gandhi. He claimed that Gandhi is also supporter of Muslim Community and future inroad of Pakistan thus, it was enough to burst Godse into anger when Gandhi protested withheld instalment to Pakistan (55 crore due to pay).

Lord Mountbatten came to be described in Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy and Governor-General this country ever had. The official date for handing over power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what Congress party calls 'freedom' and 'peaceful transfer of power'. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd, and they have called 'freedom won by them with sacrifice' — whose sacrifice? When top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country — which we consider a deity of worship — my mind was filled with direful anger.

Nathuram Godse from why I killed Gandhi

Why Gandhi Protest Withheld Amount Due to Pay to Pakistan

There was a valid reason behind that. During the partition, in the presence of viceroy, Mountbatten and other people of both the country (Jinnah, Mahatma Gandhi, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru and some other influential political leaders) had mutual agreements and terms. In the opinion of Lord Mountbatten, withheld 55 crores would amount to violation of agreed conditions and brought it to the notice of Gandhi.

Hence, Gandhi did so because, first because of, Pakistani Aggression in Kashmir where Gandhi had to go to Delhi, fasted and prayed to compel the government of India to release the amount to Pakistan. And second, Gandhi’s ethnic side couldn’t resist him from denying the agreement during the partition. To proceed with his great determination of “do or die”, he was in Delhi and continued his stay there to restore the peace in the country.

A Satyagrahi can never fail' was his formula for declaring his, own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is. Thus, the Mahatma became the judge and jury in his, own cause. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible.

Nathuram Godse

Mastermind behind the assassination of M K Gandhi

Group of suspect of Gandhi's Murder
Group of suspect of Gandhi's Murder

There were eight people linked to his murder case, those are Shankar Kistaiya, Gopal Godse, Madan Lal Pahwa, Digamber Ramchandra Badge, Narayan Apte, Vinayak D Savarkar, Nathuram Godse and Vishnu Karkare. But the most powerful person of mastermind in building the plot and plan, the police suspected 60-year-old Savarkar.

Nathuram Godse’s final and the last words in the High Court of Punjab,

“I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preachings and deeds are sometimes at variances with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of season because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the establishment of the theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhi’s persistent policy of appeasement towards the Muslims.

I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of a sentence as may be considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish that anyone else should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some day in the future.” Continue reading.

Also Read: Mahatma Gandhi: “I Do Not Remember Having Ever Told A Lie”. Also, read how Jinnah regretted on the demand of Pakistan and died at pick.

Ambedkar: Growth of community by degree of progress of women

Bhimrao R Ambedkar

Babasaheb Ambedkar (b. 14 April 1891 — d. 6 Dec 1959) was one of the great leaders of India, not only social reformers, advocate but also a man who brought literacy in Dalit community. He constituted India’s law of justice for lower-class communities. He called as chief architect of constitution of India. In his view, the respect for society comes next but before that admiration to women irrespective of the culture, caste and nation.

In his lifetime achievement, there are many things one couldn't even count. He was the only one who earned his matriculation from his lower-caste community, moreover, who first completed his degree in economics. Thus, he did many more educations and graduate programs. Ambedkar was not just a jurist, economist, social reformer, politician but also Independent first India’s Minister of Law and Justice.
Many schools, colleges and universities as well as small Dalit shops are named after his name. Dr Ambedkar brought justice to lower-caste and protected from the crisis of economic situation and help to abolish the caste system. He promised to get a good education, job and social status in India for lower treated groups. The man who born in Dalit Buddhist one could hardly get a good education, under the lanterns he finished his education in his early days of schooling. Ambedkar had deep and caring thoughts for his fellow communities.

“There should be a separate electoral system for untouchables and other marginalized communities.”

Ambedkar (in his opinion)
Ambedkar with Gadage baba
Ambedkar with Gadage baba

The Scholar statesman also had gone wrong in people’s opinions when he was strongly criticized for being personal on the caste system (especially on the side of his favourite, own caste system). That was put forward claiming that he was against secularism. A great combatant (for demolishing the caste system) finally proved Gandhi wrong in many aspects.

Listen to Ambedkar's Real Voice who proved Gandhi had been racist and never cared for Dalit and Lower-Caste communities.

Ambedkar on Gandhi

As per Ambedkar, Mahatma Gandhi had never been a social reformer neither he did anything for Dalit. Responding to the reaction of Ambedkar Gandhi wrote:

“I am not eager to die. I am eager to live and commit untouchability to the flames. And if I have to die to see that glorious hour, I am ready to die. The mantra of my life consists in making preparations of it. To live while untouchability lives is like a cup of a poison to me.”

In Gujarati Magazine/newspaper-Harijan Bandhu 1833

Gandhi’s ideologies and thinking made him Mahatma but Dr Ambedkar never liked any Mahatma, and he is sick of a question his mind was poking him every time that, “Is Gandhi really Mahatma?”
In one of the Ambedkar’s Marathi publications in the year 1938 from his writing and speeches (Vol 17, part-2), foundation of Ministry of Justice and Empowerment.

“Is Gandhi Mahatma? I am sick of this question. There are two reasons why this question annoying me. Firstly, I hate all Mahatmas and firmly believe that they should be done away with. I believe their existence is a curse to the nation in which they are born. The reason why I say so is that they try to perpetuate blind faith in the place of intelligence and reason.”

Ambedkar wrote

The position that one gets is purely based on his karma but sometimes one’s thoughts could be different. Thus, that person would criticize for that one day.
Ambedkar was born in Dalit family (commonly used to called untouchables) brought literacy and power to Buddhist. This community of India was recorded the biggest socio-economic discrimination. Read the following quote from Babasaheb Ambedkar

I like the religion that teaches liberty, equality and fraternity

Dr. B R Ambedkar
Dr Ambedkar while addressing Dalit

They were always being ignored by other superior caste and their people.

The great politicians like Gandhi did not take a step ahead fight for poor caste system the way Dr Babasaheb did in his active years.
The students could not sit in the class and were hardly given attention by the teachers. The clear story of the Lower-Caste communities was that someone from higher status used to deal with Dalit from a distance. It was like pouring a glass of water in his cup from keeping some space.

[rb_related title="Also in This Issue" total="2"]

People from another community were not allowed to touch them, neither their glass nor the water from their pots.
Ambedkar was greatly influenced by John Dewey (John Dewey was an American philosopher, psychologist, and educational reformer whose ideas have been influential in education and social reform.) especially on his recommendable work of democracy, and he was one of the great followers of his ideology and philosophy.

Vinoba Bhave: “Bhagavat Geeta is my life’s breath”

Vinoba Bhave (b. 11 Sep 1895 ― d. 15 Nov 1982) was an advocate of non-violence and human rights. Bhave was born in a Brahmin family at the village of Gogade, Kolaba (now Raigad), district of Maharashtra. He was raised in a typical Brahmin family named as Vinayak Rao Bhave, and took his last breath in Pavnar, Wardha, India.

Vinoba Bhave's writing place.
Vinoba Bhave's writing place.


The man who brought Bhagavat Geeta in Marathi (Geetai) to every Marathi lovers. He was the one who transformed himself completely from its teaching not only but perspective of life different way.
Indians considered him a national teacher of India, being a spiritual successor of Mahatma Gandhi, MK Gandhi himself accepted his estimate and assumption of being Vinoba’s father.

The man who always crave for good and good things around him, the source of positivity from every corner of his body and fragrance. Moreover, he used to stand for the truth and always stood against evil people and its karma.

Vinoba was an ocean of knowledge who could easily available to every ordinary people, indeed, he was a man of living his life for ordinary men.
Bhave was not only a brilliant student but also a great source of combination of learning, spirituality and compassion for plebeians.
This exceptional man took the biggest U turn in his life when he met Gandhi when he was searching for Kashi (now it is called Banaras) and Himalayas.

Their first meeting happened at Kochrab Ashram (the ashram was gifted to Gandhi by his friend Jivanlala Desai). The meeting was occurred after few exchanges of letters between Gandhi and Vinoba. At that time MK Gandhi was impressed by Mr. Bhave and his intuitive conversations.

Vinoba Bhave wrapped in blanket.
Vinoba Bhave wrapped in blanket.

The below letter was written at his Sabarmati Ashram, Feb 1918. After reading this small piece, one could feel how the friendship between them was on the verge of becoming stronger and deeper.
There was great expectation from Vinoba, Gandhi wanted Bhave should surpass him in all the aspects of his life as he was considered Vinoba as his son.

It is a curious phenomenon that God has made the hearts of the poor, rich and those of the rich, poor.

One of the letters of Gandhi to Vinoba Bhave is here

I do not know in what terms to praise you. Your love and your character fascinate me and so also your self-examination. I am not fit to measure your worth. I accept your estimate and assume the position of a father to you. You seem almost to have met a long-felt wish of mine.

In my view a father is, in fact, a father only when he has a son who surpasses him in virtue. A real son, likewise, is one who improves on what the father has done; if the father is truthful, firm of mind and compassionate, the son will be all this in a greater measure.

This is what you have made yourself. I don't see that you owe your achievement to any effort of mine. Hence, I accept the role you offer to me as a gift of love. I shall strive to be worthy of it; and, if ever I become another Hiranyakashipu, oppose me respectfully as Prahlad, who loved God, disobeyed him.
It is true as you say that, though outside the Ashram, you have scrupulously observed its rules.

“I never doubted that you would return. Besides, I had, your written messages, read out by Mama. May God grant you long life, and use you for the uplift of India.
I don't see any need for changes in your diet just yet. Do not give up milk for the present. On the contrary, increase the quantity, if necessary.
About the railways, no Satyagraha is required.”


“What is wanted is intelligent workers to carry on propaganda. In the issue in Kheda District, Satyagraha may have to be offered. I am something of a tramp these days. In a day or two, I shall have to leave for Delhi.
More when you arrive. Everyone is looking forward to seeing you.”

Geetai Mandir in Wardha
Geetai Mandir in Wardha

Geetai Mandir in Wardha is a house where Vinoba Bhave’s photogenic exhibition displayed and his writings in Marathi (Geetai chapters) wrote on the special different types of granite collected from the different regions of India placed in the garden.

[rb_related title="Also in This Issue" total="2"]

Those sculptured stones in zigzag lines are nothing but the pages of eighteen chapters of Geetai (talks on Geeta is available on Amazon in EnglishThe Heartfulness Way Series) from the archives of Vinoba Bhave’s writing (translation of Bhagavat Geeta in Marathi).

Also Read: The soul scrubbing poem, Vrukshavalli Amha Soyari by Saint Tukaram